中国城市宜居指数：排名分析、模拟及政策评估（英文版）

A.2 Shapley Weightage

A.1 Equal Weight Method

Appendix A Algorithm for the Computation of Rankings

3 Suggestions

2 The study also has great value in practice

1 This study has three characteristics that worth attention and appreciation

Discussant Notes 3 Comments on “2019 ACI—SASS China Liveable Cities Index: Ranking and Simulation Analysis”

Discussant Notes 2 Comments on “2019 ACI—SASS China Liveable Cities Index: Ranking and Simulation Analysis”

“Liveability” as a Trickier Concept than Cost of Living

Some Broader Observations about This Type of Research

A Few Observations about the Research.

Discussant Notes 1 Comments on “2019 ACI—SASS China Liveable Cities Index: Ranking and Simulation Analysis”

Reference

5.4 Concluding Remarks: The Making of a Comprehensively Liveable City from the Perspective of Ordinary Residents

5.3 Transport as a Liveability Factor in Global Cities: Lessons and Implications

5.2 Experiences in New York London Tokyo Singapore Hong Kong and Shanghai: Facilitating Liveability by Improving the Quality of Transport Network

5.1 Development of Transport Networks in New York London Tokyo Singapore Hong Kong and Shanghai: A Comparative Analysis of Statuses and Gaps

Chapter 5 Transport as a Liveability Factor in Global Cities: A Comparative Study of Experiences in New York London Tokyo Singapore Hong Kong and Shanghai

Reference

4.2 The Liveability Ranking based on People's Perceptions

4.1 Two Simulation Studies on Factors Affecting Liveability

Chapter 4 Further Analysis on Patterns of Liveability in Cities

3.3 What-if Simulation Results and Policy Implications

3.2 2019 China Liveable Cities Index Rankings

3.1 The Difference between Shapley Weights and Equal Weights

Chapter 3 Empirical Findings and What-if Simulation

Reference

2.8 Beauty Contest versus What-if Simulations and Its Shortcomings

2.7 Comparison between the Shapley Weight Method and the Entropy Weight Method

2.6 Algorithm for the Computation of Rankings

2.5 Data Sources Constraints and Proxies

2.4 Selection of Cities

2.3 Selection of Indicators: Ideal versus Practical

2.2 Constructing the Liveability Framework for Cities

2.1 Conceptualising the Liveability Framework for Cities

Chapter 2 Research Methodology

Reference

1.3 Outline of the Book

1.2 Literature Review

1.1 Urbanisation in China and Its Challenges

Chapter 1 Introduction

List of Abbreviations

About the Authors

Acknowledgements

Preface

Foreword

版权信息

封面

封面

版权信息

Foreword

Preface

Acknowledgements

About the Authors

List of Abbreviations

Chapter 1 Introduction

1.1 Urbanisation in China and Its Challenges

1.2 Literature Review

1.3 Outline of the Book

Reference

Chapter 2 Research Methodology

2.1 Conceptualising the Liveability Framework for Cities

2.2 Constructing the Liveability Framework for Cities

2.3 Selection of Indicators: Ideal versus Practical

2.4 Selection of Cities

2.5 Data Sources Constraints and Proxies

2.6 Algorithm for the Computation of Rankings

2.7 Comparison between the Shapley Weight Method and the Entropy Weight Method

2.8 Beauty Contest versus What-if Simulations and Its Shortcomings

Reference

Chapter 3 Empirical Findings and What-if Simulation

3.1 The Difference between Shapley Weights and Equal Weights

3.2 2019 China Liveable Cities Index Rankings

3.3 What-if Simulation Results and Policy Implications

Chapter 4 Further Analysis on Patterns of Liveability in Cities

4.1 Two Simulation Studies on Factors Affecting Liveability

4.2 The Liveability Ranking based on People's Perceptions

Reference

Chapter 5 Transport as a Liveability Factor in Global Cities: A Comparative Study of Experiences in New York London Tokyo Singapore Hong Kong and Shanghai

5.1 Development of Transport Networks in New York London Tokyo Singapore Hong Kong and Shanghai: A Comparative Analysis of Statuses and Gaps

5.2 Experiences in New York London Tokyo Singapore Hong Kong and Shanghai: Facilitating Liveability by Improving the Quality of Transport Network

5.3 Transport as a Liveability Factor in Global Cities: Lessons and Implications

5.4 Concluding Remarks: The Making of a Comprehensively Liveable City from the Perspective of Ordinary Residents

Reference

Discussant Notes 1 Comments on “2019 ACI—SASS China Liveable Cities Index: Ranking and Simulation Analysis”

A Few Observations about the Research.

Some Broader Observations about This Type of Research

“Liveability” as a Trickier Concept than Cost of Living

Discussant Notes 2 Comments on “2019 ACI—SASS China Liveable Cities Index: Ranking and Simulation Analysis”

Discussant Notes 3 Comments on “2019 ACI—SASS China Liveable Cities Index: Ranking and Simulation Analysis”

1 This study has three characteristics that worth attention and appreciation

2 The study also has great value in practice

3 Suggestions

Appendix A Algorithm for the Computation of Rankings

A.1 Equal Weight Method

A.2 Shapley Weightage